99% of people won’t reblog this because they think it’ll make their blog look as shitty as their heart.
Joss Whedon’s ALS Ice Bucket challenge
I was so impressed with this
Can we just all be grateful that this didn’t happen in his 11th regeneration
Literally reblogged this earlier today, have to reblog for that last comment.
Matt Smith would’ve broken both legs.
#12 would’ve just cussed the chairs out for ‘being in his way’
Nah, humans are more like
AKA the moments when Steve Rogers, adrenaline junkie, realized he had found His People
What if Charlie Weasley is asexual? Like what if when his brothers were going through puberty and getting crushes on girls and just obsessing over them, Charlie was just like, “Guys. DRAGONS.”
J.K. Rowling confirms it here.
This legitimately upsets me.
… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.
The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.
god i love this site
can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.
more donut per donut
See? We should have more Donut problems in school instead of bogus things like “How much is 31 watermelons, and who doesn’t have a life because he spent all that money on freaking watermelons?”
The Avengers as a 70s cop show
I’d watch this show.
So would I Mark, so would I
Get to know me meme → [3/5] current celebrity crushes → Jeremy Renner
I have a bad sweet tooth. I’m pretty good when I have to eat well for work, but otherwise, I could eat a whole roll of raw cookie dough.
i really want the avengers and the guardians to meet so i made some dumb doodles
If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.
So I saw this comment on Nicki Minaj’s Anaconda video, which completely disgust me! I am guy and just because a girl is dressed a certain way doesn’t mean she begging for a penis to be inside of her. Are you kidding me? That’s like saying I’m begging to be robbed because I bought a new outfit or I’m begging to be killed because I walk through the streets with a smile.
"And women wonder why men do that" Yeah they wonder because you would think no would mean no. You would think that trying to escape or scream for help would let the person know to stop, that’s why women wonder why men do it, because it’s a shameless act of hate. Please stop making stupid comments like this. Forcing someone to have sex is something everyone knows is wrong. It’s the man who makes the ultimate choice of forcing himself on someone else. He knows very well what he is doing.
Really slut shamming? I have no more words. And if any girl wants to shake their ass then let them it’s not your ass so why are you so concerned?
Ladies not all guys are buttholes, but with guys like this, I don’t blame you for generalizing all of us.